Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: "limit" broken on 64bit Linux?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 22535
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: "limit" broken on 64bit Linux?
- Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:41:51 -0700
- In-reply-to: <060702145022.ZM26435@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606261620310.28114@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200606271142.k5RBgcDL019327@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <060702145022.ZM26435@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jul 2, 2:50pm, Bart Schaefer wrote:
}
} This looks like it's related to workers/20728 and workers/20816, except
} that there's also a change to (if I read it correctly) allow a double
} leading underscore on the RLIMIT macros.
I've now sucessfully built 4.2.6 on the x86_64 machine, and "limit" is
fine in that build, so I don't think we need to worry about this.
} I still don't have an answer to why the autoconf perl modules aren't
} working.
That turned out to be because there was an old autm4te.cache directory
hanging around from a build on another architecture. We might want to
consider removing that directory in "make clean" and "make distclean".
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author