Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: funcstack and backtraces

X-seq: zsh-workers 22667
From: Clint Adams <clint@xxxxxxx>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: funcstack and backtraces
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 19:15:35 -0400
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <060904142643.ZM9472@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20060901191034.GA31335@xxxxxxxxxxx> <060904142643.ZM9472@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> On first blush it sounds good, but how would you propose to represent
> this e.g. in the $funcstack special parameter?

> Really it'd probably need a new parameter to avoid breaking current
> uses of $funcstack.  $functrace?

Yes, I imagine it would have to be a new array of lines of
delimited ASCII.

References:
- funcstack and backtraces
  - From: Clint Adams
- Re: funcstack and backtraces
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author