Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Buglet in zsh perforce completion function
- X-seq: zsh-workers 23542
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- Subject: Re: Buglet in zsh perforce completion function
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:19:09 -0700
- In-reply-to: <070609185904.ZM32348@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <C28AFFCD.FC29%ken.williams@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200706051812.l55ICXMM004955@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <070609185904.ZM32348@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jun 9, 6:59pm, Bart Schaefer wrote:
}
} -W FILE-PREFIX
} This string is a pathname that will be prepended to each of
} the matches formed by the given WORDS together with any
} prefix specified by the -p option to form a complete filename
} for testing. Hence it is only useful if combined with the -f
} flag, as the tests will not otherwise be performed.
}
} There isn't any -f option in your compadd, so the -W option is just
} confusing.
Ignore that, I misread "if combined" as "unless combined". I've had a bad
cold for the last few days and probably shouldn't even be trying to think
about stuff like this. This part, though ...
} Also you've said that -p and -W are the same string, which
} by my reading means [...] it would test for
} the file "$dir/$dir/..." which can't possibly be what you mean.
... still stands.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author