Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: ldd and LD_DEBUG completions

X-seq: zsh-workers 23615
From: Danek Duvall <duvall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: ldd and LD_DEBUG completions
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:07:45 -0700
Cc: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <15204.1183047166@thecus>
Mail-followup-to: Danek Duvall <duvall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Zsh workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <15204.1183047166@thecus>

On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 05:12:46PM +0100, Oliver Kiddle wrote:

> The zsh libraries are not especially cleanly linked by the way. Run ldd
> -ur (preferably on Solaris) on them to see what I mean.

One thing I plan to do next time I have time to poke at zsh is to build it
with "-z ignore" in LD_OPTIONS, which I believe ought to eliminate the
extraneous libraries in each ELF object.  If you build your own zsh on
Solaris, give this a shot, and see if it actually makes a difference.

Danek

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: ldd and LD_DEBUG completions
  - From: Peter Stephenson

References:
- PATCH: ldd and LD_DEBUG completions
  - From: Oliver Kiddle

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author