Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: curses module
- X-seq: zsh-workers 23912
- From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: curses module
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:13:42 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20071008020128.GA3143@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- Organization: CSR
- References: <20071008020128.GA3143@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 22:01:28 -0400
Clint Adams <clint@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Since there's little value in building this out-of-tree, I've reworked
> 23821 to build in-tree, renamed a few things, relicensed it, and adapted
> it to the New Module Way.
>
> Unfortunately it depends on wide character support in ncurses
> unconditionally.
I suppose it might be sensible to test for multibyte support early on in
configure and if it's present put ncursesw to the front of the library
search list? (With last week's patch --with-term-lib=ncursesw works.)
Would it be more consistent to make zcurses the command name and
the action the first argument (c.f. zle, ztcp, zsocket, ...)?
--
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> Software Engineer
CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road
Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author