Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: isearch match highlighting
- X-seq: zsh-workers 24895
- From: "Matt Wozniski" <godlygeek@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: isearch match highlighting
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:12:44 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;        bh=hS2hAK+AAVmF3MZbGFDz/kWN/HNTVYks/bTos3XB5ic=;        b=YS+njkKrSymEyNMDt0n82plp1AESqrusT9S84F6L9OVgyFo1z6Y6OWPaIvLafgufnMHC3bNVgws57oaN1TR7lGoKsjUt8ZWI8QrNJg0eIap3/thR13bBaQ/ko6ZxL1GrvtFPl3UFssuBE2VG2n4N8XbPySPRcmribvpa7lEzPbQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;        b=Hb/JbIehRVtJI8FW6beCHzq581tKwvnyed3u6xhngBHcjic/Kh0fwTbnOJD3iYI8k4mTdIeZS3FRViBm0l+QlN44O8Cc8GHQzOFutMhuIKObGHzJrZSmvGCzVzhYtDb7QAetsWvLdN1y0K2SWtXv5ciDCgCaXj7/MtUQUdavYpw=
- In-reply-to: <20080429181022.12809d23@news01>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <godlygeek@xxxxxxxxx>	 <17393e3e0804261727s560acff7sb6125d8f8b46b4b4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	 <200804271957.m3RJvxiS004075@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	 <17393e3e0804271849l30fe20bdp4008fc8247298d12@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	 <20080428102001.7b55074e@news01> <20080429181022.12809d23@news01>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:20:01 +0100
>  Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>  > On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:49:01 -0400
>  > "Matt Wozniski" <godlygeek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  > > Yep, works now - and looks very nice, though I wonder if we could set
>  > > it up in a way that would let us change the fg or bg color of the
>  > > text, rather than just reverse/standout/underline?
>  >
>  > I should get around to that before long.  I don't think it should be too
>  > hard.  I'd like to use standard termcap AF/AB codes for this instead of the
>  > hacked-in (surprise!) colors we currently use in completion, but it doesn't
>  > seem to be that easy to set defaults etc. that way.  Maybe Geoff knows
>  > about this.
>
>  This seems now to be Not Necessarily Completely Broken (TM).
Seems to work quite well to me!
>  I've just remembered I haven't documented the fact that only colours 0 to
>  255 are allowed internally.  I can't be bothered to remake the patch, so
>  I'll alter that before committing.  The numbers of supported colours
>  reported by a few terminals I tried are:
>
>  xterm: 8
>  rxvt-unicode: 88
>  konsole: 8
>  gnome-terminal: 8
>  Linux console: 8
>
>  so mostly just the ANSI set.  I did try the extended colours on
>  rxvt-unicode and they seemed to work.  I have a vague feeling I saw
>  a terminal claim to support 256.
xterm-256color: 256
screen-256color: 256
Both xterm and screen can be compiled with 256 color support.
Extended colors seem to work fine in them.
~Matt
PS: Found a typo in the man page while playing with this:
Index: Doc/Zsh/zle.yo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/zsh/zsh/Doc/Zsh/zle.yo,v
retrieving revision 1.65
diff -r1.65 zle.yo
2053c2053
< by the array parameter tt(zsh_highlight), if it has been set by the user.
---
> by the array parameter tt(zle_highlight), if it has been set by the user.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author