Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: isearch match highlighting
- X-seq: zsh-workers 24895
- From: "Matt Wozniski" <godlygeek@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: isearch match highlighting
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:12:44 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=hS2hAK+AAVmF3MZbGFDz/kWN/HNTVYks/bTos3XB5ic=; b=YS+njkKrSymEyNMDt0n82plp1AESqrusT9S84F6L9OVgyFo1z6Y6OWPaIvLafgufnMHC3bNVgws57oaN1TR7lGoKsjUt8ZWI8QrNJg0eIap3/thR13bBaQ/ko6ZxL1GrvtFPl3UFssuBE2VG2n4N8XbPySPRcmribvpa7lEzPbQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Hb/JbIehRVtJI8FW6beCHzq581tKwvnyed3u6xhngBHcjic/Kh0fwTbnOJD3iYI8k4mTdIeZS3FRViBm0l+QlN44O8Cc8GHQzOFutMhuIKObGHzJrZSmvGCzVzhYtDb7QAetsWvLdN1y0K2SWtXv5ciDCgCaXj7/MtUQUdavYpw=
- In-reply-to: <20080429181022.12809d23@news01>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <godlygeek@xxxxxxxxx> <17393e3e0804261727s560acff7sb6125d8f8b46b4b4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200804271957.m3RJvxiS004075@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <17393e3e0804271849l30fe20bdp4008fc8247298d12@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080428102001.7b55074e@news01> <20080429181022.12809d23@news01>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:20:01 +0100
> Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:49:01 -0400
> > "Matt Wozniski" <godlygeek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Yep, works now - and looks very nice, though I wonder if we could set
> > > it up in a way that would let us change the fg or bg color of the
> > > text, rather than just reverse/standout/underline?
> >
> > I should get around to that before long. I don't think it should be too
> > hard. I'd like to use standard termcap AF/AB codes for this instead of the
> > hacked-in (surprise!) colors we currently use in completion, but it doesn't
> > seem to be that easy to set defaults etc. that way. Maybe Geoff knows
> > about this.
>
> This seems now to be Not Necessarily Completely Broken (TM).
Seems to work quite well to me!
> I've just remembered I haven't documented the fact that only colours 0 to
> 255 are allowed internally. I can't be bothered to remake the patch, so
> I'll alter that before committing. The numbers of supported colours
> reported by a few terminals I tried are:
>
> xterm: 8
> rxvt-unicode: 88
> konsole: 8
> gnome-terminal: 8
> Linux console: 8
>
> so mostly just the ANSI set. I did try the extended colours on
> rxvt-unicode and they seemed to work. I have a vague feeling I saw
> a terminal claim to support 256.
xterm-256color: 256
screen-256color: 256
Both xterm and screen can be compiled with 256 color support.
Extended colors seem to work fine in them.
~Matt
PS: Found a typo in the man page while playing with this:
Index: Doc/Zsh/zle.yo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/zsh/zsh/Doc/Zsh/zle.yo,v
retrieving revision 1.65
diff -r1.65 zle.yo
2053c2053
< by the array parameter tt(zsh_highlight), if it has been set by the user.
---
> by the array parameter tt(zle_highlight), if it has been set by the user.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author