Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Bug#482346: zsh doesn't always wait for its children (-> zombie)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 25101
- From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Bug#482346: zsh doesn't always wait for its children (-> zombie)
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 02:41:01 +0200
- Cc: 482346@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20080524234002.GA35143@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mail-followup-to: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx, 482346@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20080521235008.GA5600@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080521235930.GW7056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080522233327.GA24953@xxxxxxxx> <080523073940.ZM13804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080523145722.GA12096@xxxxxxxx> <20080523224305.GN7056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080524025556.GA30511@xxxxxxxx> <20080524124445.GQ7056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080524234002.GA35143@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 2008-05-24 16:40:02 -0700, Phil Pennock wrote:
> Since you're on a rarer architecture that doesn't see so much Linux
> kernel debugging, I'd be inclined to look at what has changed in the
> kernel's architecture-specific signal handling code. (But see below).
I don't know if the bug is new. I've never killed vlc in such a way
in the past. The current kernel is linux-image-2.6.24-1-powerpc
2.6.24-7.
> Further, it's strange that zombies are contributing to load average; if
> zsh is gone (killed off and no longer even possibly stuck in a tight
> loop) and there's the zombie and init left, then there shouldn't be
> anything contributing to load avg.
Yes, that's strange.
> If you use tools such as top(1), what processes are they attributing the
> load to?
None, and the CPU is idle:
top - 02:31:55 up 22:19, 6 users, load average: 4.09, 4.24, 4.25
Tasks: 117 total, 1 running, 115 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.7%us, 0.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 98.4%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 255432k total, 233456k used, 21976k free, 3004k buffers
Swap: 524280k total, 22820k used, 501460k free, 105548k cached
(The zombie is vlc.)
> Is the high load average confirmed by vmstat reports of idle
> CPU, or is the load avg really out of sync with CPU reality?
Here's vmstat output:
ay:~> vmstat
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
0 0 22820 26456 5520 99688 0 0 15 35 30 196 8 1 88 3
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author