Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Is there any interest in indentation patches?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 25312
- From: "Richard Hartmann" <richih.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Andrey Borzenkov" <arvidjaar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Is there any interest in indentation patches?
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:33:53 +0200
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=hHCPELTje7saxAh1VBvM3OiHu07H4aA5G+7Et8afGIw=; b=XyUupSbirfyWCjGJ/qto6pa3TJ68R9tvnrKQz/IX59HRnJBcm86BVY0UUvoakUShM1 wVZOcyuqsITaw0aBsEDr6gcs1AGzBAu48gdmEvVr6xqvUrK+PobRcyQXqGo3qQAfoRwB bG1mCDviFRGU9hyW4qwPUtEGkE8McFaRgwdd0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=aFF38w/hcD2hpz9t9aEP2XJGNSN6fRhDO67Gs40WYkLzKC6iWfRgA8p3HQteTqpvNx mG87hnAgZAZpcEk7PUG73uEoYDO5TEhiMfGJmIUnQlwVwgrgoKe5If6RTcju+P41c2dp t03WYgBie3DfSetBbM+fb6JIc9EZeGFc4uv5c=
- In-reply-to: <200807200940.14695.arvidjaar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <2d460de70807191721x683551cdifa946bf1b70e4cf7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200807200940.14695.arvidjaar@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 07:40, Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If you will start it, may I ask to add standard mode lines for vi
> (and possibly emacs) so that selected style is ensured in the future?
Yes, if I do it, that would be a Good Thing.
> In general, I guess, yes. The main problem with functions is they
> have overly long lines, specifically where _arguments is used.
Should be doable :)
Richard
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author