Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: trap DEBUG should get run beforehand, not afterwards.
- X-seq: zsh-workers 25358
- From: "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: trap DEBUG should get run beforehand, not afterwards.
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:01:57 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=WJQ6FPX8hQTzHjtNqzm9eLmVvY/ew5eIaiuhKnmYMYc=; b=Z257L80FZn5D2+2IIwcsvVeub+QueMCTmRQxksApwx3fkPQr2thGEaeWzjORYk9pNL kUsDwzEFvxPV5+o0RZFoVteUqdqOHbe42grv0iXkZ9PZmstp1rlSeZYTK9oyNH/MM9bA 1+jruNLs7N8MffrjNuOe4TaoiYxyPNKE40L/E=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=NMU5uS+vDQsCTv+o9G7i+v3kdMQt2UF21s9Mt++rnSF0PbGkJtCCbnv2QOBh9jDwu+ fDkXeuIYGWVBu4hrHZYLAaixVdnFy0TQkYC13//Rfuhc3QAuYPMTsusrAn5UQb2PkFJU ujgoYPVh1WZVh93ovn3le0Cys9jQiqqH3/r/0=
- In-reply-to: <080730063846.ZM9004@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <6cd6de210807291937p5e864c38o6dd9785acf62632c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200807300823.m6U8Ndvs016235@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6cd6de210807300624j37ade3a3r91f1e0e03ad07188@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <080730063846.ZM9004@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Bart Schaefer
<schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jul 30, 9:24am, Rocky Bernstein wrote:
> }
> } A minor quibble is that the default is set in a way that will likely
> } cause confusion and the learning zsh-specific remedy . Are most of the
> } zsh defaults set so that they are compatible with ksh88 and bash 2.05a
> } and before?
>
> No, they're set so that they are compatible with previous versions of
> zsh. You'll find, as you follow the -workers list more, that we're
> very concerned -- a lot more so than most OSS projects nowadays, it
> seems to me, but also rightly so in my opinion -- with breaking the
> expectations of long-time users.
>
Sure. I understand. Is there any evidence that this would break any
expectations? That's the other question I asked.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author