Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Fix a typo in _git.
- X-seq: zsh-workers 25471
- From: "Mikael Magnusson" <mikachu@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Fix a typo in _git.
- Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:27:31 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=AmDmAS5Iir+rdgmVLXCf/0Fadd33WmLxI1qKMf6HBQc=; b=rVoIO8kwfk9h0peu3qpOHha3huGiLnAHSLPAVM8JiqAHzqPjjuwmMsKxm4EWXMr62N Iqf6p1NPusTw0WxUGkOzadjz4hY3TFMpmbE3cKRaiXnNigzhNXOzlWjaUrJrVMB4H7Vo K5q51vFlbVeqToRSvV475AuXgjd6S7+A130Sc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=tUrRVMC0RHUvkW/puDFJyIB841QbUu75znw34LyNzKOnrxeODqFANl4+NR2NvKf4mP 3SaFm1WB2KZdIw4Srb5ScLLtCYZgR0prviwYL+UZVz1piMAzy7qreiEwNbjpnVBoykAy Pnmp7t30gUoqnNsJcw9j2mjsogBjJnCMSf/AI=
- In-reply-to: <20080817171321.GA24334@xxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <237967ef0808151656j7787f169g4b3456910e05bfc2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080817171321.GA24334@xxxxxxxx>
2008/8/17 Clint Adams <clint@xxxxxxx>:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 01:56:36AM +0200, Mikael Magnusson wrote:
>> http://git.mika.l3ib.org/?p=zsh-cvs.git;a=history;f=Completion/Unix/Command/_git;h=mika
>
> Not committing this one; what's the advantage of for-each-ref and why
> aren't you using _call_program?
git branch is a UI command, it's not guaranteed to always indicate the current
branch with a * for example. It also doesn't tell you if a branch is
in refs/heads
or refs/remotes. The completion doesn't differentiate between those yet, but
it definitely should, I don't think I'll be able to fix that though.
As for _call_program, I don't really know what the purpose of that is. I don't
have a reason for not using it though.
--
Mikael Magnusson
You have the same broken reply-to as the other guy, which means you
won't be in the to: field, and i have to remove myself manually each
time.
Either that, or gmail is doing something non-standard.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author