Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Regression in braces completion
- X-seq: zsh-workers 25880
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Zsh Hackers' List" <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Regression in braces completion
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:56:21 -0700
- In-reply-to: <200810131627.m9DGRoED017498@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20a807210810111932r1b32b746l3cca788a383e84ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <081011213249.ZM29979@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <081012001051.ZM30706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081012204236.6669a668@pws-pc> <081012154721.ZM22722@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081013100417.36870ba5@news01> <081013084328.ZM28630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200810131627.m9DGRoED017498@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Oct 13, 5:27pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
}
} However, that's overloading -U with multiple meanings: not just "use my
} completion as it is in your results table" but "forget everything you've
} done so far and insert this the way I want".
I think if you look around at the other uses of -U in the existing
completion functions, you'll find that it's employed in the latter
way in a significant number of cases. In other words, it's too late,
-U has already become overloaded.
--
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author