Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: select problem
- X-seq: zsh-workers 26357
- From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>, david sowerby <d_sowerby@xxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: select problem
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:45:42 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5yBwCScSgjdEO7RlYqiGOeXEwUM6JTCm6PuaQUyEbQc=; b=YihlOrW4kerAxBq51zBjTVHFo7EXQ6ps1Ll68KFspWQfQCT1NUuP5Q8KSJtntSSgUj dhv5s8bBZLQRzipvZ+9RkdJN07juc6R8oUp7iLiHL77EbAyRDE79h5omcB32Sd4rW74j 4fguBm65kECqwsP2uMyeCgiZw/yyn2tqcezGg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xctxQ5toIVvUYdvxfv17njYtCle79Hf6Jz5JNj2Gx4b1Y8ctyhYkaH+Nh58CVRdD+A LUKe17fXlPBdaE2OgyX5mqwllmRjG9hKjyJ+4TZk8up9LBtXpeUU5MmeRzR0XcPlsiv7 C2OCJwTZwoFFjea4THwe6cDSoA90v2lQg+6xM=
- In-reply-to: <20090118143905.GA4898@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <234804.32891.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090117092515.GA5400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2d460de70901170321g66b892dei2a4e5fac9c445db8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090118143905.GA4898@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 15:39, Stephane Chazelas
<Stephane_Chazelas@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Still, I can't think of how a script could be reasonably made to
> rely on that behavior, which is why it's not a problem that all
> shells break POSIX conformance there, in a same way that running
> a POSIX script with zsh (in sh emulation) generally isn't a
> problem because it's only in corner cases that zsh is not
> conformant.
Having symlinked zsh to /bin/sh for some time on my system,
I have to say it's a quick way to make your Debian system
stop working. Grml had a similar experience which is why
they went back to Bash.
> When a POSIX conformance issue is found by someone,
> it is generally raised on this mailing list and most of the time
> fixed (at least in sh emulation).
Afaik, there are several issues open. If there is any interest,
I can try to round them up so they can be shot.
> Having said that, I agree there's no much point of having zsh as
> your POSIX sh.
AFAIK, that is the official stance.
Richard
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author