Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: sticky emulation
- X-seq: zsh-workers 26557
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- Subject: Re: PATCH: sticky emulation
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:37:58 -0800
- In-reply-to: <20090211202840.000b37aa@pws-pc>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <18952.1234307021@pws-pc> <090210191804.ZM7110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090211202840.000b37aa@pws-pc>
On Feb 11, 8:28pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
}
} Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
} > What about zcompiled functions? Obviously there's no special case for
} > them, but their treatment may be worth explanation at doc time.
}
} I've done that.
I guess I'm specifically interested in what happens with "zcompile -c"
which takes a function already defined in the shell and writes it out
compiled. Suppose this is used on a function with sticky emulation.
If the compiled form is then reloaded, is it still sticky?
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author