Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Git mirror at SF
- X-seq: zsh-workers 26884
- From: Frank Terbeck <ft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Git mirror at SF
- Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:44:44 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20090426160547.GB22294@xxxxxxxxx>
- Mail-followup-to: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20090314192359.GA17014@xxxxxxxxx> <20090314215123.GO16375@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090315055916.GA13623@xxxxxxxx> <20090315165437.GA19800@xxxxxxxxx> <20090315212017.GC19800@xxxxxxxxx> <20090404221212.GA21390@xxxxxxxxx> <20090426102937.GA4326@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090426160547.GB22294@xxxxxxxxx>
Wayne Davison <wayned@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:29:37PM +0200, Frank Terbeck wrote:
> > a) I don't see any new tags (like one for 4.3.10-dev-3).
>
> Tags weren't being pushed, so the newest one (I assume you meant
> 4.3.9-dev-3) wasn't in the public repo, and older tags were pointing
That's what I meant, yeah.
> to older hash values. See if my tag push helps your other issue too
> (since I'm not sure what visualization tool you were using). The
It was gitk.
> various http://zsh.git.sf.net/ shortlog pages show the tags in their
> right places now.
Well, zsh-4.3.9-dev-3 is there now. 4.3.9-dev-2 and -1 are not, but it
seems the cvs repo is lacking those symbolic names, too (at least 'cvs
log' does not mention them) - so I guess that's fine.
The non-linearity of the repository didn't vanish after I pulled. I
did a re-clone after that and now I cannot find it anymore... So
I guess my previous repo was broken for some reason. So, sorry for the
noise.
Regards, Frank
--
In protocol design, perfection has been reached not when there is
nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
-- RFC 1925
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author