Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: non-interactive set -m
- X-seq: zsh-workers 27105
- From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: non-interactive set -m
- Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:13:31 +0100
- In-reply-to: <loom.20090709T140144-598@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <loom.20090707T205334-50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200907080858.n688wXfc030608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <loom.20090708T124251-758@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200907081349.n68DneSv001850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <loom.20090709T140144-598@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Eric Blake wrote:
> Peter Stephenson <pws <at> csr.com> writes:
>
> > > POSIX requires that 'set -m'/'set -o monitor' be switchable on the fly
> >
> > You're right---there's another test of the same kind there (i.e. that
> > we're interactive). This removes it. Let me know if you run up against
> > more, or if there's some hidden interaction with the
> > interactive/non-interactive mode (I wouldn't bet against it).
>
> I'd love to test this. However, I'm behind a firewall, and can't access CVS.
>
> Is there a snapshot available?
> http://zsh.sourceforge.net/zsh-4.3-daily-snapshot.tar.bz2 appears to be a dea
> d
> link. Or are there any plans for moving to a newer VCS, such as git, which
> makes http access much easier?
There's an almost up-to-date git mirror available; see
http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2009/msg00516.html
--
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> Software Engineer
CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road
Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author