Re: minor niggle with svn completion of sub-commands

[Greg Klanderman <gak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>>>>> On November 9, 2009 Greg Klanderman <gak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From reading the documentation on _arguments, I would think the
> '1: :->cmds' spec would match, since we are in fact completing
> the first argument, even though there are subsequent arguments.

Would anyone mind taking a quick look and validating for me whether
you agree that it looks like _arguments is doing the wrong thing here
before I dive into trying to debug that?

thanks,
Greg