Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [PATCH] _git: offer files relative to current directory
- X-seq: zsh-workers 27507
- From: Nikolai Weibull <now@xxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] _git: offer files relative to current directory
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 23:16:38 +0100
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xGQhfhciLVN3jwNbZWldkNSkDkvgmVaaXc1MEM787rg=; b=Ny6hrcztMzhoXedomrl29EACSLFb9JLDxJZ3udFqHxY7o7JoLolLgdQUg8oHrmrJhL /RGwOhFeahY4zb6Mn90QX07h/+7KZHEZJpPbKaUcFeXZMLtjesHE6c1sGQXt93pSnPB+ zvjuZXygJY9i34asn7KnWaYe1KZE/XaxG9qfg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=AFXlRfies4T3hTHkOech63AsMN0L4ggj2043CK+xbIH9XW1l3TvgGbEgfS1XP5peoG qcZtdyrmKzqzyHDuzdT3dbUqVLhkoBI5eNC8uaFRVDooVIHc234js4m8zbjxYvDmYtku enkCqaI0XEiGtWln5DB5N1PbB9atsQUJxJPEs=
- In-reply-to: <20091213213334.28bbeb66@pws-pc>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20091205174551.GF3344@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1260136353-20093-1-git-send-email-raorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091213000820.GA20752@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091213213334.28bbeb66@pws-pc>
- Sender: nikolai.weibull@xxxxxxxxx
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 22:33, Peter Stephenson
<p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 03:08:20 +0300
> "Alexey I. Froloff" <raorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:52:33AM +0300, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
>> > When offering repository files (cached, deleted, changed, etc), make
>> > sure that paths are relative to current directory, as git expects.
>> So, what about this patch? ÂWill it be accepted or rejected?
> Please can someone who uses git decide.
I think that it should be included. I'm the original author of _git,
by they way.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author