Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [PATCH] _git: offer files relative to current directory
- X-seq: zsh-workers 27508
- From: ÅtÄpÃn NÄmec <stepnem@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] _git: offer files relative to current directory
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 23:22:50 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=0Cr+m5EnfegNEtpRu1yqpo0uzow/kNenG8trWpinMSM=; b=VvhQjsxah5YoEgV3ab19NtlgR7Hv1LvLB+oXrokqqDZyvA6HGI/TJCb59dzA9BhucG nKaGZjLGu95PHPYuB9DmMofC8YnHZGzpCShREJPYBJ8xPwtEtNiI9wO3s2ompBF3jbrr OU1t9GLDzFKvJ3VF1AuDemD4Qyvgs2bHipiNA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=du0rcaBq4WkZSBSs5OBWBuypbyusrMqjE/rgUpH57Zj7djIjwiQyp16y21qeQQTMFw 0JojEct2bgeo1F+70XqIeVKNvIzBSKzPOwr/j9tDqgNesaLSetHPn30cjq4QfjP4ltnP Va5s7JGzaHJ7sFJhdmd2/IAl6B/hsfpeauqb8=
- In-reply-to: <20091213213334.28bbeb66@pws-pc>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mail-followup-to: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20091205174551.GF3344@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1260136353-20093-1-git-send-email-raorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091213000820.GA20752@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091213213334.28bbeb66@pws-pc>
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 09:33:34PM +0000, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 03:08:20 +0300
> "Alexey I. Froloff" <raorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:52:33AM +0300, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> > > When offering repository files (cached, deleted, changed, etc), make
> > > sure that paths are relative to current directory, as git expects.
> > So, what about this patch? Will it be accepted or rejected?
>
> Please can someone who uses git decide.
I assume this calls for voices more authoritative than mine;
nevertheless, as someone who took part in its discussion and tested it,
I can only recommend this patch -- it fixes a real and visible problem
with the current git completion.
(I also remember a user complaint about the current incorrect behaviour
in the #zsh channel on Freenode -- that was actually what instigated my
interest in fixing the problem myself originally)
ÅtÄpÃn
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author