Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Manpage names in Doc [w/ patch]
- X-seq: zsh-workers 27663
- From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Manpage names in Doc [w/ patch]
- Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:46:54 +0000
- In-reply-to: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1002041157440.2729@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1002041157440.2729@xxxxxxxxxxx>
"Benjamin R. Haskell" wrote:
> While looking up something about HIST_SUBST_PATTERN, I noticed a typo in
> the Zsh manual it referenced. So, I looked for other wrong manpage
> names and found a couple. Patch attached and inlined (What's the
> preference? I never remember).
Thanks.
I prefer inline patches if your mail system doesn't mangle them:
experience suggests anything to do with Microsoft is likely to ensure
plain text is messed up in some way or another (no matter how many
attempts you've made to tweak Outlook or Exchange). Attachments are
always fine, however, in any case of doubt (patch even handles DOS line
endings, thought that's a bit baroque).
ps
Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author