Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [PATCH] _git: Also complete FETCH_HEAD, ORIG_HEAD and MERGE_HEAD.
- X-seq: zsh-workers 27819
- From: Nikolai Weibull <now@xxxxxxxx>
- To: "Benjamin R. Haskell" <zsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] _git: Also complete FETCH_HEAD, ORIG_HEAD and MERGE_HEAD.
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:27:29 +0100
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oGG/7ijMZB6Zv/6ArpmFKAJv0U62PTlR4d1qZcbrZno=; b=jg70Tfz8WWAUSFp2vMsvJEnggb6/Ks1SCxAiXHZuSpl5UU24sFn3MVis8rK4FEt/u4 qV6LWMRRQS5OvHLHLCUJTXlq6ry2HUqhgY5Fztgq81Z9LO/wQ99rq5DsInN4i11C+vmd V1QSNxA2aZLHP8MEBnZlrZk9N/Bj6x3cDCW+A=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Sqysvo0hwSlJpc04KHOp4Ewb7xmxlRCCkvq+Yp8k33a0i6xNuH3vyO11jGo8RMMfH9 GcovA0uU1n20huv5aLtrKBqCT9Hg+K7hokaUCEtS0nD3UA0XZyuWjHeoVErmuOx+VXM1 i5E6cxaL8DWQde78DOHMHjWnd7oitNGKZB0J0=
- In-reply-to: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1003212134370.19615@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20100321172336.GA4151@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LNX.2.01.1003211540430.19615@xxxxxxxxxxx> <dbfc82861003211317t7617b83ex2be594d2d994f328@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100322012544.GA6014@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LNX.2.01.1003212134370.19615@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: nikolai.weibull@xxxxxxxxx
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:30, Benjamin R. Haskell <zsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Testing the existence of $gitdir/{refname} seems a fine compromise.
> (Really, I don't see the issue; this seems like a drop in the bucket of
> _git's performance issues... ÂI s'pose the forks are prohibitively
> expensive on Win32? ÂRevised patch below anyway.)
> (In case it's unclear, I prefer my previous patch -- doesn't _git fork
> all over the place? -- but either one's preferable to no-change or
> always-adding-them.)
Yes, it does, and, as you mention, itâs horribly slow to fork on
Windows. I mean, what where they thinking? But I question the value
of forking for this particular test. Still, itâs more correct to use
rev-parse. As your patch uses rev-parse to find gitdir once already,
weâre not gaining much by globbing instead.
I just ran a benchmark on Cygwin and it takes about 0.5 seconds to run
four rev-parses.
Perhaps completing them all without checking if theyâre valid
beforehand is the best solution?
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author