Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: _git: Add completion for help subcommand
- X-seq: zsh-workers 28471
- From: Wayne Davison <wayned@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: _git: Add completion for help subcommand
- Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 10:10:56 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received         :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject         :from:to:content-type;        bh=pPKbuowTR65uMPzxpvalYljHtzHZhtxlMOJNPGdbDbI=;        b=wV2Xv94TxnjgeWrA0qQ8soaeKuWMeRzD32aksFDNIA6PCpbIJh1nFsTq894tNPqUhg         ferZhYr5fYw5NsYJ1GIitzLhUWP0h/SI8dIuUYQWz2pcx2zpj7eOOdENPX1jXWTSfrzd         GNioSyMz8/hqVTwk4pGFnC8sovzGDiUPwlmRI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;        b=Rp4xl2oxJ3MFKezU7fXTO7DnrWySEC/Ig2iBMHpJhz8VAV+/amzF3OQ0zWeXxkPUc3         tuSbC0AK5874DG+3g/Q01FvvfX6e1H/VIatZGxLWHttbwL2X2rHlFNhE/ICi6cGnIptg         RqjwXuZWhOfmo47N44i7QNS8L1UYfPJcLcvaA=
- In-reply-to: <20101202004429.GQ4479@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <1282393263-16767-1-git-send-email-aaron@xxxxxxxxxx>	<AANLkTimOcmpFpTrrVMsuvjCR8puCnhoRVsmduci=SP8d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<20100827002003.GA8399@xxxxxxxxxxx>	<AANLkTikK9VE0ToESknTwOVdWT+d-JqNhkveDY1bSf8Ym@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<20100827231832.GA29397@xxxxxxxxxxx>	<AANLkTi=njjskXGJFzOTWRzBmU1Gd+gRUALBaGmZ9JHoE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<20100828005150.GB29397@xxxxxxxxxxx>	<20101202004429.GQ4479@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: 4wayned@xxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Aaron Schrab <aaron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It doesn't look like this has been committed to the repository yet.  Is
> there some further objection to it, or has it simply been overlooked?
>
I re-read the discussion, and it looked to me like everything got resolved,
so I committed your patch.  If not, we can always patch it.  Thanks!
..wayne..
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author