Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: 4.3.11 TRAPEXIT() on cygwin
- X-seq: zsh-workers 28622
- From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Anthony Heading <anthony@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: 4.3.11 TRAPEXIT() on cygwin
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 02:50:49 +0100
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8eKfpAtcI1yAfQXEBtQcWevob/tQ0V3U1oIJTqCRzB4=; b=b/kiAyIlHf9fehWJ/DKrjb/pGukTQ3N5g8X+AK/YHdB7pQ7GOiRcsZxAyvYypZkyXr m8V2iqVRhsiyGGtP8fXOoIeMrTQdreKDm2anxNOolsj7E7Lrj5iPEFzqD3O0pTfg9l/1 7l5kMeRM+XLXFJ+EUwiMe0Xb1d1grsPCoggaA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=usvX1iSEPt79NjJg/oebl7xZtbF8pK/AqnIXr/ubr/Jd+pUQUw5hf0509cYG0mb9YC etxyWfq+KWNHkZQ5OPNfmRbY6f37zwdADoWRUJO6cQV4B87Z9Z2PT2sM4VodKsB2nVHX RKNvf1o1bDCMhgrdNbrW+buvqfDeoo4Jkk/ow=
- In-reply-to: <1294710389.18824.1414500371@webmail.messagingengine.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <1294704977.26846.1414490063@webmail.messagingengine.com> <AANLkTikQfZrm9hra-q3y_VRgxP5JdmtuW5cGiORrNNAa@mail.gmail.com> <1294710389.18824.1414500371@webmail.messagingengine.com>
On 11 January 2011 02:46, Anthony Heading <anthony@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Errm, yes I remember seeing that discussion, but it was basically about
> pipelines, traps set within subshells, and implicit vs explicit exits.
>
> I don't believe this is the same thing.
>
> Anthony
Please don't top post.
From the referenced mail:
> Other cases I missed before include anything along the lines of:
>
> echo $( trap 'echo exiting' EXIT)
>
> or similar substitutions. That's quite clearly a subshell entering to
> the same extent a ( ... ) is.
How is that different from what you wrote?
Which would be quoted here for reference if you hadn't top posted. ;)
--
Mikael Magnusson
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author