Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Updated _git completion (not attached)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 28804
- From: Nikolai Weibull <now@xxxxxxxx>
- To: Frank Terbeck <ft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Updated _git completion (not attached)
- Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:25:50 +0100
- Cc: Wayne Davison <wayned@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zsh Workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HgBO31HhS2musLZK3ulP/+dJ9I8jeTxCSu2IQ318Kvo=; b=A/vENRi1LwuWJeDF6R7EWEvFw4Iq49OQd3kFKsitiAMwhvgTvx2aB0zo2h/7PY77zR m1D4gYrKpWjNGBL1e7eStjbkFxJrDtyD6v9bW8Fs/stFKqNYKQZC13HpYkldD/aqy3mo zpVZXUWKR17IXzUBPWywVTurQEquDEYcDop2s=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=i9Vv/6Mn5XVITi4U0z9hUwjv2I2uNkk6HOWDEeZlgXP3Z8aAFGBjs3ZWuRr0exAEzt ZtkjSUHA0LXCrciEZaAIBb2dveFVatDV+0cV1RIDYggQoVoHE1nyMigvI9GSaTvA/bWU I1MW09U5XT4lI3STv4rdJ8Uu5Qo1soIXwSlzw=
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTikxHareFnnmsUy8Gu=HQY_2qGuY-owMBn+SEUrn@mail.gmail.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <AANLkTikuCtPdY1T_7vUBoHmeXWvth_V=V-Sbi-SJX4jj@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimxbgzGPx3i0rGmkU7QkeC2A9yj21w974MY+9H-@mail.gmail.com> <87ei6tex5r.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org> <AANLkTikxHareFnnmsUy8Gu=HQY_2qGuY-owMBn+SEUrn@mail.gmail.com>
- Sender: nikolai.weibull@xxxxxxxxx
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 13:03, Nikolai Weibull <now@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 08:47, Frank Terbeck <ft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Wayne Davison wrote:
>>>> https://github.com/now/zsh
>>> So, is anyone evaluating this for inclusion? I gave it a look, but I
>>> haven't done enough completion-function work to really evaluate if we want
>>> to do any merging or just replace what we have now with the reworked
>>> version. I'd be glad to check it in, if that's what we want to do.
>>
>> Since Nikolai (the guy who wrote that updated function) wrote most of
>> what we have in CVS right now, I think we should merge that new _git
>> completion and see if it breaks for anyone. I suspect it won't.
>
> I was kind of hoping that people would check out my updated version,
> give it a test, give feedback, and then we’d merge, but I have only
> gotten two complaints (from Simon). I would like to fix them first,
> then we can merge and let more problems be reported.
>
> I will look into the problems Simon has reported so far today.
It was an easy fix. It’s now available in the repository mentioned above.
Wayne, I would appreciate it if you merge this branch into the main repository.
Thanks!
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author