Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [PATCH] Add openSUSE specific command completions
- X-seq: zsh-workers 29122
- From: İsmail Dönmez <ismail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Benjamin R. Haskell" <zsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add openSUSE specific command completions
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 09:06:21 +0200
- Cc: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=namtrac.org; s=www; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=F9iOLooj2Jp5WaQ+guuNYC0I6QPOcWUkqP0SpYk/uZA=; b=Nd/pmV0aLt6Irmvlm/QGQR/WqpOBnDn9vbAHoC0Erue0IwATF3pceEAzZysQOFsu/C vRgY2SYQgDVsNG5T99Ci08nBZ9TbpweVfvQlG14kv5ldhCVz8Ahdo5quutVq3TWBE7ZZ FAimD/DlJzgVB0+85Qyrww5kvTpDcBECzGvnA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=namtrac.org; s=www; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=czZsPFLM1WD8TzC3ExD0UGQY2ONv9NtXRd78VaLK4Zff3X1opCdoSH9yVpUqRkCnx3 D9ssl28UKD6CW4icC9KhA4KDm0lk9ucqVZi0QDgvvJv7BwzXY3I05dq4IXQjwscpeJH1 fNYa4w2m2taZr4qIiUTZwiWbBJMQIoqH/qN4E=
- In-reply-to: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1105012032210.28316@hp>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <BANLkTimxYEMTCjJnzRTZMTvTxi-Zq3WvBw@mail.gmail.com> <20110430175956.675b969a@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <alpine.LNX.2.01.1105012032210.28316@hp>
Hi;
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Benjamin R. Haskell <zsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011, Peter Stephenson wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:49:43 +0200 İsmail Dönmez wrote:
>>
>>> These completions were getting rot in openSUSE zsh package. It would be
>>> nice to get them included upstream.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, just got back from holiday, skipped with glazed eyes over zillions
>> of emails but noticed this and committed it.
>>
>
> I noticed that a couple of those (_osc and _zypper) had copyright notices
> in the files (which didn't seem to match the submitter), and that they were
> "released under the GPLv2."
>
> Are those okay to include without Zsh itself being GPL'ed? I see the
> LICENCE file states that "any provisions made in individual files take
> precedence." That makes it fine?
>
> (Asking out of curiosity more than anything.
I can ask the original authors to relicense if thats a problem.
Regards,
ismail
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author