Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Another uncommitted patch

X-seq: zsh-workers 29188
From: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Another uncommitted patch
Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 18:42:05 +0100
In-reply-to: <110506082228.ZM21415@torch.brasslantern.com>
List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <110506082228.ZM21415@torch.brasslantern.com>

On Fri, 06 May 2011 08:22:28 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Should I commit users/15442 ("SH_WORD_SPLIT, $* and null IFS")?
> 
> I remember seeing something from someone about the "YUK" comment, but
> whatever it was is not linked as a followup in the archive.

I think the fix is probably reasonable, however I believe I suggested
just sticking with basing it on SH_WORD_SPLIT to reduce the number of
different behaviours; having three is probably more confusing than just
changing the behaviour which isn't obviously correct anyway.  I suspect
the YUK chunk went with Wayne's fix to multsub.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web page now at http://homepage.ntlworld.com/p.w.stephenson/

Follow-Ups:
- PATCH Re: Another uncommitted patch
  - From: Bart Schaefer

References:
- Another uncommitted patch
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author