Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: [PATCH] better systemctl completion

X-seq: zsh-workers 29849
From: foudfou <foudil.newbie+gmane@xxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] better systemctl completion
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:19:45 +0200
In-reply-to: <20111024100147.1724c732@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <j81f58$q4i$1@dough.gmane.org> <20111024100147.1724c732@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>

On 24/10/2011 11:01, Peter Stephenson wrote:

On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 18:27:27 +0200
foudfou<foudil.newbie+gmane@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:

Attached is my proposal of a systemctl completion function. Compared
to the existing function shipped with zsh, it brings the following
enhancements:
- up-to-date command/arguments definitions
- finer per-command completion of units


Please could you send a context diff ("diff -u") showing what it is
you're changing.


?... I believe the attachment is already a patch produced by "diff -u" (git-format-patch actually).

What may not be clear is that my proposal is a replacement of the existing completion function.

Best,
Foudil

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] better systemctl completion
  - From: Peter Stephenson

References:
- [PATCH] better systemctl completion
  - From: foudfou
- Re: [PATCH] better systemctl completion
  - From: Peter Stephenson

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author