Re: Bug with bash emulation regarding ':'

[Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:08:18 -0800
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I agree that this covers everything.  (It's a bit convoluted that it's
> possible for both PF_SHWORDSPLIT and PF_NOSHWORDSPLIT to be true at
> the same time, but <shrug>.)

I'm not sure they can be true at the same time, I think they're always
in different branches and each paramsubst() passes a fresh set of flags
rather than using the ones passed in.
 
> Incidentally, are we in any danger of conflict with the "PF_" prefix
> as used in <socket.h> for protocol families?  PF_UNIX, PF_INET, etc.?

We had quite a lot of PF this and that.  I've made them more readable by
renaming them to PREFORK.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web page now at http://homepage.ntlworld.com/p.w.stephenson/