Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [PATCH 16/16] _git: Document --early-output
- X-seq: zsh-workers 31623
- From: Nikolai Weibull <now@xxxxxxx>
- To: Øystein Walle <oystwa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] _git: Document --early-output
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 22:42:28 +0200
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LubSlNRUQwORdxYGHlo2fcwSRFAVnsevgZHBo+VEfgU=; b=0fAFP1BWRBG8OYH3FyM2aXrz7UDVEGXxDhcSxJRTxPH/QoMD2svr9vKdbsOw0F3rMM /u7zx78hPIUXRGGE8iBjsFMyd7CLwKh4mRf5MO06nPRmL9aWNqvzpaf8Ujx2LMn/DH6c bAYU1q2VQWtWsHCngn4flfcDvL2D6rsaf1kE+cgcav8EuZJOhgbklOTiM1FfCtB9ZYMA MAZTaiGI7WcWRw2d/Q6HhnUqzflVGrW0ErRA+Kq5SJP4sREWzS95zs1nLFKTyZCMfKd6 YFRTlDsafQVXOPyEwEs8WatUahXCLLAKp/xzIgQbE3YJceYncsvEo+iLl02cEaP5amYX 4YRA==
- In-reply-to: <CAFaJEquG7_qUYwK6CFV=n1+8kzT7g3g8JBFCdnnnUQhcFrczOg@mail.gmail.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <cover.1375006129.git.oystwa@gmail.com> <a8731d9d3b21a5a6225b228795d21862bcc0ced7.1375006129.git.oystwa@gmail.com> <CADdV=MvFK6C3g6dmSHEJzuGizkoiFf8=WGHmTEg6C1PPSKErcQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFaJEquG7_qUYwK6CFV=n1+8kzT7g3g8JBFCdnnnUQhcFrczOg@mail.gmail.com>
- Sender: nikolai.weibull@xxxxxxxxx
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Øystein Walle <oystwa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 30 July 2013 16:35, Nikolai Weibull <now@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Øystein Walle <oystwa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> - # TODO: --early-output is undocumented.
>>> - '--early-output=-[undocumented]::undocumented'
>>> + '--early-output=-[generate some output early even if not done]: :__git_guard_number "number of commits"'
>>
>> The point here is that --early-output isn’t documented in Git’s
>> documentation. Please notify the Git developers that it isn’t so that
>> the description here can match that in the documentation (once
>> written).
>
> I was planning on writing the corresponding patch to Git too, but the logs make
> it clear that this option is only meant for other calling processes.
>
> While it would make sense to document it in Git's man pages still (what other
> reference is there?) it makes less sense to suggest it for interactive use.
>
> I suggest you ignore this patch.
Agreed.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author