Re: [PATCH] don't treat alone grouping pattern as glob qualifier

[Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Nov 18,  8:30am, Han Pingtian wrote:
} Subject: Re: [PATCH] don't treat alone grouping pattern as glob qualifier
}
} On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 10:40:41AM -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote:
} > However, I can't immediately think of any reason why a paren should be
} > considered part of a "trailing set" when nothing precedes it ...
} 
} Yes, because there is nothing before (s*), it wouldn't be treated as
} qualifiers, I think.

Anybody else going to chime in on this?  Are there other cases where
the (s == str) test in the patch could be true but the paren really
should be treated as introducing a qualifier?