On Thu Nov 21 16:10:50 2013, Bart Schaefer wrote:
On Nov 21, 6:13pm, Aaron Schrab wrote: } } This sounds like it may be the same issue that was addressed by the } patch in workers:31985 (http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2013/msg01038.html), } sent by Clemens Hammacher. That's probably true, but looking at VCS_INFO_reposub I think applying 31985 is still going to break %S in the way Hong already mentioned.
I just tested this patch, yes it did break %S. Hong