Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: [PATCH] Re: (Y) modifier: up to N matches?

X-seq: zsh-workers 32709
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: (Y) modifier: up to N matches?
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:16:58 -0700
In-reply-to: <20140604230835.GD1970@tarsus.local2>
List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20140602182346.GB1858@tarsus.local2> <140602204603.ZM26905@torch.brasslantern.com> <20140604020804.GA2032@tarsus.local2> <140603234229.ZM29030@torch.brasslantern.com> <20140604230835.GD1970@tarsus.local2>

On Jun 4, 2014 4:08 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Bart Schaefer wrote on Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 23:42:29 -0700:
> > It might even be preferable if (Yn) implied (odoN).
>
> What would (odoN) do?  It produces the same output as (oN) alone, since
> presence of (oN) causes any other sort qualifiers to be ignored.

I verified by comparing the output of **/*(odoN) vs **/*(oN) that they may
in fact differ.  I didn't dig into exactly how or why.

More later when I have time to peruse the patches.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Re: (Y) modifier: up to N matches?
  - From: Oliver Kiddle
- Re: [PATCH] Re: (Y) modifier: up to N matches?
  - From: Bart Schaefer

References:
- (Y) modifier: up to N matches?
  - From: Daniel Shahaf
- Re: (Y) modifier: up to N matches?
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- [PATCH] Re: (Y) modifier: up to N matches?
  - From: Daniel Shahaf
- Re: [PATCH] Re: (Y) modifier: up to N matches?
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: [PATCH] Re: (Y) modifier: up to N matches?
  - From: Daniel Shahaf

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author