Re: $(...) and <<

[Stephane Chazelas <stephane.chazelas@xxxxxxxxx>]

2014-07-31 17:42:08 +0100, Peter Stephenson:
[...]
> > An issue tracker needs to be part of a larger plan -- we tried using the
> > tracker at SourceForge but it didn't work because no one monitors it, so
> > it became an issue black hole.  At the moment there isn't anyone to take
> > that responsibility.
> 
> Yes, exactly.
> 
> A full issue tracker allowing public input is a lot of maintenance work.
> In principle it would be less work just to have an internal list of
> issues that's basically the result of discussion on this list and can be
> published as such.  But it's still some work for someone.
[...]

What about github?

Would it really be a lot more work than following this ML?

-- 
Stephane