Re: Surprising parsing result with anonymous functions and for loops

[Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:07:36 +0200
Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I haven't looked at the parsing for the anonymous function stuff, but
> if it's not too hairy to fix, my vote is we drop this easter egg at
> some point.

Unfortunately I think defining functions without braces is part of the
standard, though little used these days.  This would have to be a
special case for anonymous functions, which is less useful.

pws