Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: zsh 5.0.7

X-seq: zsh-workers 33335
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Zsh Hackers' List <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: zsh 5.0.7
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 17:25:54 +0100
In-reply-to: <141002091656.ZM12380@torch.brasslantern.com>
List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
References: <20141001203847.2a7c000d@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <20141002165807.0dc13b68@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <141002091656.ZM12380@torch.brasslantern.com>

On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 09:16:56 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Oct 2,  4:58pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> }
> } Source distribution documentation.  Does this sound right?
> 
> I'd leave out the word "major" -- we don't know of any exploits, do we?

Nothing that would screw you up any more than getting anything else from
the environment that you didn't sanitise, I don't think.  So it can
leave you more open than to the effects of incautious programming.  Not
sure if that counts.

pws

Follow-Ups:
- Re: zsh 5.0.7
  - From: Phil Pennock

References:
- zsh 5.0.7
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: zsh 5.0.7
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: zsh 5.0.7
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author