Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: BUG: failure in "vcs_info prompt" aborts precmd function
- X-seq: zsh-workers 33787
- From: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: BUG: failure in "vcs_info prompt" aborts precmd function
- Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 23:03:59 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1416780241; bh=uAmb3QAhWuXw7vpaUO6R0aeOZqcklvrLm26oJVZkWmw=; h=In-reply-to:From:References:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=oxn3x7FXEK7UJMRdJJVTZ9hXUDPHcBLUJ59SsDsTFQab9D1cN9OhF8d+jw40IO2o+aBw7tvDLZWc8gmsXzD+knrketY3RCIhE8Y271YyOc8H5Z3qPtBheJjgOhuVqhg0xbcWsuUDJzUkSrFLuSGbZqcgyORqKER1ZBmcZgug1nbHYs6PXA4aBJIXxxNgOa6lAOkLD6p+a4svYREiIL7XEwyqqx8VHUG70jnkW9pitpsLJz11aAefNj8VaxQ8LdN7HR7wjNUmvRRfNOR110XTcIVPQp47rW2U07oOHDBtl8oE35rP+1/AsfKB7wE+k4Zttr4JrSjYZGBo2f7AswI/RA==
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=yahoo.co.uk; b=LWhDXebFBxnkYeZOa2AQPkhB8hKe4Sp+1crIgYECp5WCL7NeE+q4xbsgrI70t81i47Adk2p4xgNnSgPu9+UkiouYVyUu6MH0l9lnX1BaXLQst3fycSh/HDHhv55C12FJszhdKfRwrPsqaHwlKBHJhyHti8PkdT5ORKVmyeOqf3AENw7qWHNxDmqbm7kElGFZNENKTiN/A/wvKbtcTfz3f7qf6zk2FvM6enJ4QC7JloUoboUPAwYZCoeE8N+E2czkDcnDdbaFN0blBfS1I8huzFnI+3U/yLdeiuwP0kEkxI49Em/N4fLzvIV8ioFz7sXOxaSOIxjX/0LvTDXC1yKINw==;
- In-reply-to: <141123101345.ZM10525@torch.brasslantern.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <5470C427.4050805@thequod.de> <CAHYJk3S5pBBNnAKqyGRYq7KAstpSAJOPQRdbHjoKrurLKFbOcQ@mail.gmail.com> <5470CF7C.2000707@thequod.de> <CAHYJk3R81LhwfwxaDHRSMP0HZmbE7V3hrrn5Q4jGzRzBPRC=oQ@mail.gmail.com> <5472040F.8020803@thequod.de> <141123101345.ZM10525@torch.brasslantern.com>
Bart wrote:
> It's pretty easy to make it behave like a failed external command; can
> anyone recall why it wasn't, other than to avoid allocating an empty
> linked list? It has been a fatal error since before revision control
> was in use. It is possible something really depends on being stopped
> by this error?
I'd think it was unlikely.
Neither bash or ksh (88 or 93) treat it as a fatal error.
I'd vote for applying the patch.
Oliver
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author