Re: 5.0.8 regression when waiting for suspended jobs

[Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 07:58:58 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We could special-case the SIGTT* signals, we obviously know (from the
> status that's printed) which signal stopped the job.

That kind of makes sense, since very few if any(?) other signals have
this retry-and-fail-again-immediately behaviour.  Many other IO-related
signals are permanent failures, anyway.

pws