Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: What's the next release number?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 37442
- From: "Benjamin R. Haskell" <zsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: What's the next release number?
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:07:12 -0500
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=benizi-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=FTUIwH/oEVoOmsrmNMjbwGJ2dxUeIQHub7HEsiWsN4E=; b=CdS6UTz0kG7Z3Zcg7GBhQOuReMm2TqRiIgxThOfomyK75kMBDAqaSAqD6zeYEH2bQY em+JhXI+pnPzF+wUOvP/3g98oEFe5ec8vLr27WyFEI/Fmp9YBB9t9MURqFblW1s8u+GV 6xW4X3tz7XGQjxtWc2SHp9UjGo2WkVHc+5BoI5vHqsbIajuWZjdvlNDVEhH61qmOZR7u Iag6HWgTzdwUa/ZMjcctfYR5CP3XsNet/ekBbRYBfAcNVvU8HRp8tuOF0JGcxQAkxssL cVbfpt3jMq573f8G4pILQWeBcc6mqxruLdlpmTNUuGhBYvK/4j+xzkgcIIXV8fQuy7Ut t/nw==
- In-reply-to: <20151228150238.GD2010@tarsus.local2>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20151228150238.GD2010@tarsus.local2>
- Sender: benizi@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> How can I now, at a given point in time, what will be the next release's
> version number?
>
You can't know. It depends on how significant a release it is.
I keep running into situations where I need to refer to a change made in
> master using the release number it's expected to first appear in, and
when I try to guess what that number will be, I get it wrong. (E.g.,
> when 5.0.8 was current I wrote "The change will appear in 5.0.9" and
> there is no such version. Ditto for 5.1.2/5.2.)
> I could say "the change will appear in the release after 5.2", but
> that's needlessly complicated: I'd much rather be able to say "The
> change will appear in release ${foo}" for one specific value of ${foo}.
>
What's an example situation? "The change will appear after version X.Y"
and "The bug was fixed after version X.Y" both seem reasonable to me for
situations that need a description in natural language.
For something automated (e.g. `is-at-least X.Y.Z`), you can just assume it
will be a patch release, since the version increment will be at least as
much as a patch release. Even if no release ever exists with that specific
version, the next release will still compare as greater.
--
Best,
Ben
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author