Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: refactor memstream for "print -v"
On Jan 5, 11:47am, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: PATCH: refactor memstream for "print -v"
}
} On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:48:21 +0000
} Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
} > > - I note in passing that "print something >&-" is explicitly not an error,
} > > but "print -u1 something >&-" IS an error. Also unchanged here.
} >
} > In the second case we've explicitly been told to "do something" with the
} > fd, which happens to be dup'ing and fdopen'ing it. There's no such code
} > in the first place, and there doesn't seem any point in making the
} > second case silent.
}
} Actually, it appears this is deliberate.
Yeah, I knew it was deliberate, though I'd forgotten about the discussion
with Zefram.
Recent bash do emit an error on "echo >&-", for whatever that's worth, in
case we want to revisit Zefram's argument.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author