Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Slow highlighting (Re: "drop-in replacement" and transpose-words-match)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 37756
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Slow highlighting (Re: "drop-in replacement" and transpose-words-match)
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 22:20:57 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject :mime-version:content-type; bh=awNoutVef/okuJ3pBoioJye+RbLq8k9l7QG0BKbkkPE=; b=H0gz0esmSsvrpEgIXkSW4ZOhIU69KqEeSk5C7OUXQFsVfFndu9V3h1f3bSxmbyMVap 8v3l0gEAc5uUyAnTbBp141Zik9d3M1oocm3MUC/42cca2dI5qq8ZoVuYYlJACsQ56PzS Mg1f1dpEEpxTF2cLu+VLd8XvEERhZ7AWgjeon1LuN0haxTbYiRTAM0X+8TpgwNPamteF +29KYoqc6HFu+2MBqAkOyYicbKwOPS2Z6L4qh29I7Z7IZiZyid5y0bTDeFeqsOdEoE8e bFCaRuXsvFPldABJd5RPVvCI01WfpTGB035rnrBcU99T9mm56yIcVbQ6pQo7+2fr5ikB 8wvQ==
- In-reply-to: <20160123235303.GE20278@tarsus.local2>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <160111233259.ZM6719@torch.brasslantern.com> <CAKc7PVDhxbVgmV7WcGgyDzMmWSjwQ=7=LExXTwr7YvPzPpn2RA@mail.gmail.com> <160118223126.ZM28565@torch.brasslantern.com> <CAKc7PVB-X+DYVEHRqSoOiDAjNeTsVyz=EN72FHQuF=AnRmh65A@mail.gmail.com> <160119195608.ZM31931@torch.brasslantern.com> <20160123235303.GE20278@tarsus.local2>
On Jan 23, 11:53pm, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
}
} [Re-analyzing on every keystroke] doesn't explain the slowness on
} fned buffers: the initial highlight of an fned buffer involves exactly
} one _zsh_highlight call, and yet is slow.
Is it similarly slow on any use of "vared"? What about with a history
line containing a function definition?
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author