Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [PATCH] _virsh (Was: Re: zsh virsh completion)
Hi,
On 2016-07-21 09:57, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Marko Myllynen wrote on Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:36:36 +0300:
>> On 2016-07-20 09:58, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Marko Myllynen wrote on Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 15:06:52 +0300:
>>>> + _cache_virsh_cmds[$_cache_virsh_cmds[(i)$icmd]]=()
>>>> + done
>>>> fi
>>>> if (( ! $+_cache_virsh_cmdopts )); then
>>>> typeset -gA _cache_virsh_cmdopts
>>>> fi
>>>> _arguments -A "-*" -C -S -s -w \
>>>
>>> Oliver remarked on the -w earlier, are you quite sure it's correct?
>>>
>>> -w In combination with -s, allow option stacking even if one
>>> or more of the options take arguments. For example, if
>>> -x takes an argument, with no -s, `-xy' is considered as
>>> a single (unhandled) option; with -s, -xy is an option
>>> with the argument `y'; with both -s and -w, -xy may be
>>> the option -x and the option -y with arguments still to
>>> come.
>>>
>>> (-s and -w are options to _arguments, -xy is a word on the command line
>>> being completed)
>>
>> I mentioned that virsh accepts all the following: -r -d 0, -r -d0, -rd
>> 0, or -rd0. So to me it would seem that -s -w is correct here, right?
>
> All these require only -s [without -w].
>
> Does virsh accept «-dr 0» where the 0 is argument to -d [regardless of
> whether -r takes an argument]? _That_'s what -w is about.
Aha, no, it doesn't - yes that sounds very rare indeed, so much that I
didn't even think of that scenario.
> Could you suggest how to clarify the man page section I quoted?
Perhaps change "with both -s and -w, -xy may be the option -x and the
option -y with arguments still to come" to "... with arguments still to
come for -x"?
Thanks,
--
Marko Myllynen
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author