Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: time builtin vs. time(1): difference in memory numbers
- X-seq: zsh-workers 39667
- From: Baptiste Daroussin <baptiste.daroussin@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: time builtin vs. time(1): difference in memory numbers
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 18:27:59 +0200
- Cc: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=J5TS91Jl1NH26M3lAEJid7TF5d3pEurzCA4NnlqoRxg=; b=n+F9aSnOxQCcY86UIdbNyqFO2JQDZ0R8Giv5S1Me8laqGnTiDhmg2MGVMitLM9y0YM q+m7s/ZswLrNXpuJ/OrT98ZLPGkYYwWjQfgfuEsz1zSlKWcVGX+XajdVXXtoK8Ob2NhH NyY1dw7N/d49nCQ4/KYcy57Kk35OXRLqaSRMOKQhrk7+9d4V0BjSXoCxjTr+tMGZBYW7 +utWp0OVgQK2DNFRVnxpibv1B4ZtKNPJpodZbm+TZmCCV2bSbAl7cB7n66WoUEcaLoSs S/x/mN71v+CHfQjdSPXRRnCmCj3Ls5/rGrjqVBkiMBJzz7tqWy2OXIPtXAz87jEjGn80 Y4Ug==
- In-reply-to: <20161017094725.6c57f0f2@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <868w06l3cq.fsf@gmail.com> <101204102844.ZM5983@torch.brasslantern.com> <86tyisv48o.fsf@gmail.com> <101205055913.ZM32440@torch.brasslantern.com> <86mxokm60k.fsf@gmail.com> <CGME20161016183019eucas1p148f2bc95fc3b4be841e3f6dbca7ea2fb@eucas1p1.samsung.com> <CAPKC6oJcCEtDYwhDcHJeFLQcbEBAZnAF=08G3VRU4fWBHbMvwQ@mail.gmail.com> <20161017094725.6c57f0f2@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
2016-10-17 10:47 GMT+02:00 Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 20:29:23 +0200
> Baptiste Daroussin <baptiste.daroussin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I would like to revive this thread as we are having this patch in
>> FreeBSD for a while now.
>>
>> https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/getrusage.diff
>>
>> What would be the next step to get it upstream (and modified if needed?)
>
> The safest way would probably be #ifdef's for Free BSD, unless someone
> is going to do a wider investigation into variant system behaviour.
>
> The "long clktck" declaration needs to go with the declarations at the
> top.
>
> pws
I think the ru_maxrss part is valid for linux as well. (unsure)
Best regards,
Bapt
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author