Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: [PATCH] getstrvalue() optimization

X-seq: zsh-workers 39903
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] getstrvalue() optimization
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:44:07 +0000
Cms-type: 201P
In-reply-to: <1478765664.2345819.783251825.66CA877B@webmail.messagingengine.com>
List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
References: <CGME20161108133901epcas4p257eb8a5bd308d2393769c4a3a2fc3731@epcas4p2.samsung.com> <1478612273.1810945.781106353.1EF6BF52@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20161109123916.175e0bc6@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <1478765664.2345819.783251825.66CA877B@webmail.messagingengine.com>

On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:14:24 -0800
Sebastian Gniazdowski <psprint@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
> I thought to make some things clear, not sure if without this any
> problems are possible (tried to obtain bad behavior but Zsh worked
> normally).

I don't think this needs a special case.  If it did, I think that
would mean some assumption in the code was already broken.

pws

References:
- [PATCH] getstrvalue() optimization
  - From: Sebastian Gniazdowski
- Re: [PATCH] getstrvalue() optimization
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: [PATCH] getstrvalue() optimization
  - From: Sebastian Gniazdowski

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author