Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: E01options test failure for workers/39915
- X-seq: zsh-workers 39980
- From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: E01options test failure for workers/39915
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 01:49:04 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=Z3KbWJzSpwEa3LN sUhdCpaIbHII=; b=BmItUe++o6HxoYkeHOL7fCLxsfmzV78xmrxVda9w1tlcuI5 oolFAp+L6JHy4rJ9B5pdVEWfG4BEoZWB5yN0Lw4bSDPKJkDx+sIT96jULKmSX8vS FN1Feqy/P9c0EADnNcHoWiQD1pUjxZ5w1bIfMflpEKZDtEdzWZrX6OTf+PN0=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=Z3KbWJzSpwEa3L NsUhdCpaIbHII=; b=CC0x4mcvGxfuYYKAbQT2Ugus51vpNzIvg9p2h0tZ5L3DXT fJX/URfUfxZKEGSIOqNvyQSJpCw+2ui2g+cmmYm0NHATAUH4YS9UvILVNFwQoqUw 0XSlm9MvRRCX9Ig1+si9daaVAbMH6VijvUKTJqG80DYlCsLgXj13SYRkgjvOU=
- In-reply-to: <20161117194658.4304ea00@ntlworld.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <161117094556.ZM30570@torch.brasslantern.com> <20161117194658.4304ea00@ntlworld.com>
Peter Stephenson wrote on Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 19:46:58 +0000:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:45:56 -0800
> Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Test ../../zsh-5.0/Test/E01options.ztst failed: bad status 0, expected 1 from:
> > (setopt pathdirs; path+=( /usr/bin ); type ./env)
> > Was testing: whence honours PATH_DIRS option
>
> This must be some kind of race. I saw it once the first time I tried it
> but it's gone away and I can't get it to happen again. But it's an odd
> thing to have a race in.
I cannot reproduce it. Didn't see anything obvious in code inspection
either.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author