Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: BUG: Zsh crashes
- X-seq: zsh-workers 40364
- From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: BUG: Zsh crashes
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 02:32:04 +0000
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=IbRuN83lLwiONuf 4Rk6bcRslbKQ=; b=Sx8MAG+WjFqn8cWzDJz1jBaqwTya2vk/d4MSEbRMYHhkEmd yCi6mKo0cRq8+kXBsn5Zg//kLXgROZz36PlEekHvt6FDyEi1/dahs5bFTPvGlJ9X 5V5BDDgIfRhaESFpkVfgU2bHXikeO2hsBjQWbPndcRAKHkDWPYS2eNdYAylw=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=IbRuN83lLwiONu f4Rk6bcRslbKQ=; b=ej4PEyn1abmwZDdJzkMUqy+ko/zusJlSFbxz6kcF06g4My vSyfFoS4ZmO9vn52Vr1SinYu6dXnDGf3otMCuOOfuJQmMZsWS313xUbQPxtQbdiY vL8esrpvnn8DirRxfSc7IwubmNuMRR3ep4bQc0GqGRfkVeOO5u/Ajhv2f9KHY=
- In-reply-to: <20170114221052.12a4539b@ntlworld.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <CGME20170113174208epcas1p109452434d2f95e52b24e49029ce15943@epcas1p1.samsung.com> <DB6PR1001MB10324259D98A08DA4938F0E6D7780@DB6PR1001MB1032.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20170113175242.16210658@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20170114010859.GA22474@tower.spodhuis.org> <20170114024833.GA26958@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> <20170114203624.2c396d08@ntlworld.com> <20170114221052.12a4539b@ntlworld.com>
Peter Stephenson wrote on Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 22:10:52 +0000:
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 20:36:24 +0000
> Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Removing the "=" after flowgraph stops it ("it" includes any reports of
> > errors in mem.c, of course). So this points at something to do with how
> > _values handles values.
>
> Can someone else see if this helps?
I can reproduce errors without the patch but not with it, using
_f() {
.. the completer you posted ..
}
compdef _f f
f <TAB><TAB><TAB><TAB>
I applied the patch to 33799ae2b00c; the changes after that don't appear
to be relevant.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author