Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: LOCAL_VARS option ?

X-seq: zsh-workers 40385
From: Jens Elkner <jel+zsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: LOCAL_VARS option ?
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 10:43:07 +0100
In-reply-to: <20170119065408.GA5534@fujitsu.shahaf.local2>
List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Mail-followup-to: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20170119065408.GA5534@fujitsu.shahaf.local2>

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 06:54:08AM +0000, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Phil suggested on IRC a LOCAL_VARS option that has the effect of making
> all newly-declared variables local; e.g.,

Hmmm, I like the implicit way ksh93 does it, i.e. if declared within a
"function $fname {...}" declared function using 'typeset', it has local
scope, otherwise (i.e. not typeset or typeset in "$fname() { ... }" aka
old style declared functions) shared. Not sure, whether this can be
accomplished with zsh as well ...

have fun,
jel.
-- 
Otto-von-Guericke University     http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/
Department of Computer Science   Geb. 29 R 027, Universitaetsplatz 2
39106 Magdeburg, Germany         Tel: +49 391 67 52768

References:
- LOCAL_VARS option ?
  - From: Daniel Shahaf

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author