Re: PATCH: autoload with explicit path

[Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:26:12 -0800
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think the implied question was "Given that this works if I don't use
> an explicit path, why isn't there a way for it to work when I do want
> to give an explicit path?  (Now that explicit paths work at all.)"
> 
> Where "this works" means having a function name with a slash in it.
> 
> I think it's a rather rare case that we may not want to bother with, but
> we've bothered with all sorts of other rarities.

I think the official answer is "well, you'll just have to lump it".

If there's a clear use case that someone needs we can no doubt find a
way.  I hadn't even registered that this worked (with $fpath) until I
started looking.

pws