Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: workers/40626 (commit 6c476c22) causes multiple test failures
- X-seq: zsh-workers 40666
- From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: workers/40626 (commit 6c476c22) causes multiple test failures
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 07:45:49 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=/Hn5SHgQVlWJIpl +rPNF/Vx9EnY=; b=UamRZVfIBpi+qpx6r1qUvARR7rFp/tzzO6EscLkSMwVriOp IGbUcXFE1UJ8lOpicX985ydYJwPmjkyAIAucVblHL8nHTWOFY8Edl8TU96ftUVA2 c/R6o0ujXBTq/vmPUNqJYXpQZO4y7LLIv1/wkCQaRWq9HjOHGLWPSug5wtVY=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=/Hn5SHgQVlWJIp l+rPNF/Vx9EnY=; b=F3N1EO9EHOFcrx0BbNHD/IEbFktPNkCDvXz4lo5ajVOl9D aRRsC/5UL8+NEuHyX1rwaq8833pzqDGM/O+9i9Y9QzHAVX/XejfNVeIGYXpdyk4v Znwe567an2Av6Fw4Q4AQyhiLZlvC0VVw+93Wr4ZWEFrfJoOWh1guJXt7GR3nE=
- In-reply-to: <170226114216.ZM4201@torch.brasslantern.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <170225160455.ZM15040@torch.brasslantern.com> <20170226061620.GA3729@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> <170226114216.ZM4201@torch.brasslantern.com>
Bart Schaefer wrote on Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:42:16 -0800:
> On Feb 26, 6:16am, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> } Subject: Re: workers/40626 (commit 6c476c22) causes multiple test failures
> }
> } Bart Schaefer wrote on Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 16:04:55 -0800:
> } > This is just the first one that dies:
> }
> } I could swear 'make check' had passed before I pushed this, but I can
> } reproduce this. No time to debug, so reverted. Sorry for the breakage.
>
> workers/40508 always seemed questionable to me.
>
> I suspect this is what comes of some attempt to optimize assignments.
> There may be cases where the recopy operation in these set*() functions
> is redundant, but I don't feel like tracking that down just now; it is
> definitely necessary for $options, so ...
Thanks for fixing this.
For future reference, James (who reported the original bug offlist) has
since reported another symptom:
% autoload -Uz compinit; compinit; setopt listambiguous; options+=()
% <accept-line>
% a<TAB>
zsh: Segmentation fault Src/zsh -f
The latest patch fixes this one, too.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author