Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
V11db_gdbm.ztst fails on Cygwin
- X-seq: zsh-workers 40694
- From: "Jun T." <takimoto-j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "zsh-workers@xxxxxxx" <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: V11db_gdbm.ztst fails on Cygwin
- Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 19:52:39 +0900
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
V11db_gdbm.ztst fails on Cygwin as:
./V11db_gdbm.ztst: starting.
--- /tmp/zsh.ztst.2148/ztst.out 2017-03-02 19:26:45.040189100 +0900
+++ /tmp/zsh.ztst.2148/ztst.tout 2017-03-02 19:26:45.055788600 +0900
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-c
-d
a
b
+c
+d
Test ./V11db_gdbm.ztst failed: output differs from expected as shown above for:
ztie -d db/gdbm -f $dbfile dbase
dbase=( a b c d )
zuntie dbase
ztie -d db/gdbm -f $dbfile dbase
print -rl -- "${(kv)dbase[@]}"
zuntie dbase
Was testing: replace hash / database, scan
./V11db_gdbm.ztst: test failed.
${(k)dabse} gives 'a c', instead of 'c a' as expeced by the test.
The order the records are visited by gdbm_{firstkey,nextkey}()
depends on the hash values used by gdbm, and (due to some reason
unknown to me) it seems the hash values used on Cygwin are different
from those used on Linux. The gdbm I'm using on Cygwin is from the
Cygwin's package repository (binary distribution).
Is it really necessary to test that gdbm_{firstkey,nextkey}()
gives the same order on different OSs?
PS
On macOS V11db_gdbm.ztst succeeds (with gdbm built by myself from
the gdbm source).
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author