Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [PATCH] __git_recent_commits: prefer recent commit objects
- X-seq: zsh-workers 40944
- From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] __git_recent_commits: prefer recent commit objects
- Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 18:25:24 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Uc63Z2kD0KJktoST5V V6wnPdIWOzNjZmoPazpUyr/6M=; b=MkaCAy0p+FkRV82uhifWbh2h4XgVbrnXIJ gYz02LE8YbrHa4FUG9pJw0oSFHdjCtmlJlXnLLV/IecnspyQi+t6aazEopRdv/ad jSS5Oxvib2k7RFff3WgaqT5xb7tQ0H7i3LX5/WtnaiduOnzBshePhtFvqMiRiUD+ EgGJP0BET2z/eRp0d7W8xtfrgCw4t801xbt77WwK02n/mglwl4iYBFjDx28Q37rN RLb1d+qWr7S9qZyulzCG6SnRxjfi/ybjTAq0fbO1Y2SmMXLkoxjUCcCzjEvEdpHv eOTQHZHjTjvN1yvVXWvEQIvUqxP8TJBFCi0JlNjkg1G+QJej+BJQ==
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Uc63Z2kD0KJktoST5V V6wnPdIWOzNjZmoPazpUyr/6M=; b=hte7SsrHU8YZam6Ph7mCv9Va+BaSuK3HUs sTjJ2FKN0ZsmmYdLJ7vy68578pqhVJI0LjXLyqzntf9RB62RRoqBlUfb3y5lXFlu x7miWfdfig9B070tep5pCQUmbEtaN/sREag5YR0Eos5beimwtJVFThMh2a10hXHL YZ+J1n5c26N5DZ+1FfeesuK6jLKQDycYR/0VdlT8kfV44iW4qruMzO49M179TezV pfdR9DII9zGwMeGH8VdAazLGvSy7rxygBSKR8E2p6m3lQcdsb2zxtYavEokijLsA 1VZvCIm6dmTLqe2+6eN3JcDFKQ0hCUPS3MQUGfbM9VFelAGgM7/w==
- In-reply-to: <20170409152335.20372-1-genml+zsh-workers@thequod.de>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20170409152335.20372-1-genml+zsh-workers@thequod.de>
Daniel Hahler wrote on Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 17:23:35 +0200:
> RFC: Daniel Shahaf mentioned that `expl=()` might not be right here after all,
> so I am waiting for feedback before pushing it.
I don't think fixing that needs to block this patch. I suggest that,
whether the expl=() is right or not, to go ahead with this patch, since
it doesn't make things any worse in that front and does fix your issue;
and if the expl=() is wrong, we can fix it in a separate patch.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author