Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Add redis-db module to upstream?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 41255
- From: Sebastian Gniazdowski <psprint@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Add redis-db module to upstream?
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 06:01:36 +0200
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
On 8 czerwca 2017 at 00:10:20, Bart Schaefer (schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> rather than further overloading typeset. We need a way to select
> the module (ztie -d ...) and to specify external objects (ztie -f
Current option set:
Usage: ztie -d db/... [-z] [-r] [-p password] [-P password_file] -f/-a {db_address} {parameter_name}
Options:
-d: select database type: "db/gdbm", "db/redis"
-z: zero-cache for read operations (always access database)
-r: create read-only parameter
-f or -a: database-address in format {host}[:port][/[db_idx][/key]] or a file path
-p: database-password to be used for authentication
-P: path to file with database-password
Also, -l for "load password", for the password mechanism. Not so cool mnemonic ("load"), maybe a better one can be invented.
> store in a simple attibute-value database. Specifically to zsh it can
> be used to share state among shells (for example IF we could rely on it
I heard fish has the universal variables, shared among sessions. Too bad I don't know how to do typeset -F SECONDS=0 there, I would compare performance there too:
echo ${#redis_list}; typeset -F SECONDS=0; repeat 1000; do local -a copy=( $redis_list ); done; echo $SECONDS
1100
1.4957760000
local_list=( $redis_list )
typeset -F SECONDS=0; repeat 1000; do local -a copy=( $local_list ); done; echo $SECONDS
0.5719420000
So not that bad, x2.6. For array of 5 elements:
typeset -F SECONDS=0; repeat 1000; do local -a copy=( $redis_list ); done; echo $SECONDS
0.1843630000
typeset -F SECONDS=0; repeat 1000; do local -a copy=( $local_list ); done; echo $SECONDS
0.0125850000
That's 14.6 times slower, but only 0.000184s per access. So not even a 1 ms time. This was for system under load (compilation of Emacs), without load the 1100 results are the same, while for 5 elements, it's: 0.1277 vs. 0.009106, x14, 0.0001277 per access.
Cool idea about the clustering mechanism.
--
Sebastian Gniazdowski
psprint /at/ zdharma.org
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author